Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  794 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 794 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S778

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion

The correction method implemented herein for the

Dosimetry Check system has proved to be an effective way

to reduce verification inaccuracy caused by backscatter

from the Varian EPID arm and can be used to enhance the

previously established portal verification method for IMRT

using this technology.

EP-1474 Feasibility of dose delivery error detection

by a transmission detector for patient-specific QA

H. Honda

1,2

, K. Kubo

1

, R. Yamamoto

1

, Y. Ishii

1

, H.

Kanzaki

1

, Y. Hamamoto

1

, T. Mochizuki

1

, M. Oita

3

, M.

Sasaki

4

, M. Tominaga

5

, Y. Uto

6

1

Ehime University, Department of Radiological

Technology, Toon, Japan

2

Tokushima University, Graduate School of Advanced

Technology and Science, Tokushima, Japan

3

Okayama University, Department of Radiological

Technology- Graduate School of Health Sciences,

Okayama, Japan

4

Tokushima University Hosipital, Department of

Radiological Technology, Tokushima, Japan

5

Tokushima University, Institute of Health Sciences,

Tokushima, Japan

6

Tokushima University, Institute of Bioscience and

Bioindustry, Tokushima, Japan

Purpose or Objective

Dose delivery error detection of on-line treatments is an

important issue for clinical QA practices. The goal of this

study was to evaluate a feasibility of the delivery error

detection by a new type of on-line transmission detector

compared to a 3D detector in patient-specific QA

measurements for VMAT treatment.

Material and Methods

The Delta

4

Discover system is a transparent, p-type

semiconductor diodes detectors, placed in the accessory

holder of the treatment head. The system measures the

dose by the accelerator directly and evaluates the dose

delivery error to the plan. We have used True-Beam

(Varian) with 10 MV photon beams and a QA plan which

underwent prostate VMAT. For the QA plan, we prepared

seven modified MLC files in which MLC positions were

manually shifted between 0 mm to 3 mm, respectively.

Then, the dose delivery errors were measured and

analyzed dose deviation, distance-to-agreement (DTA)

and gamma index by the Delta4 Discover system as well as

to the Delta

4

3D dosimetry system. All measurements were

compared against the points that received less than

appropriate percentage dose (<10%) were excluded from

the gamma index calculation.

Results

The results of the Delta4 Discover system and the Delta

4

3D dosimetry system using all available points for the

gamma calculation, 95.7±5.9% and 97.8±3.5% of them

passed the criteria (3%/2mmDTA/Th10%), respectively.

The two systems also had high correlations of dose

deviation and DTA, permitting the routine verification of

VMAT patient-specific QA plan as well as permanent in-

vivo dosimetry during the patient’s treatment course.

Conclusion

In this study, we have found that there was high

correlation between the pass rate and the intentional dose

delivery error, as respect to dose deviation, DTA, and

gamma index of the Delta

4

Discover system and the Delta

4

3D dosimetry system. It was suggested that the dosimetric

verification system under investigation could be useful for

routine patient specific QA.

EP-1475 RBE estimation of different Brachytherapy

sources based on micro- and nanodosimetry

M. Bug

1

, T. Schneider

2

1

Phys. Techn. Bundesanstalt PTB, 6.5 Radiation Effects,

Braunschweig, Germany

2

Phys. Techn. Bundesanstalt PTB, 6.3 Radiation

Protection Dosimetry, Braunschweig, Germany

Purpose or Objective

Depth-dependent RBE values of typical photon-emitting

Brachytherapy (BT)-sources were determined by a

microdosimetric and a nanodosimetric approach. The

microdosimetric approach considers a biological endpoint

while the nanodosimetric approach is entirely based on

the track structure, given by the interactions of the

photons and secondary electrons. The track structure

characterizes the radiation quality on the nanometric

scale.

Material and Methods

Within a cylindrical water phantom, isotropically emitting

BT-sources were positioned 4 cm below the surface.

Studied were Co-60 and Ir-192 representing high-energy

photon-emitting sources, I-125 being a low-energy photon-

emitting source, and Intrabeam

®

- and Axxent

®

-devices as

examples for electronic BT X-ray sources (EBX). Resulting

photon spectra were calculated at several points along the

cylindrical axis within cylindrical voxels of 0.5 mm depth

and 2 mm radius up to a depth of 10 cm.

The

microdosimetric

calculations of RBE are based on

yield coefficients α

dic,

representing the linear component

of the dose-effect relationship for the dicentric

chromosome aberration yield after an irradiation with

monoenergetic photons. The RBE for a given source in a

given point was determined by convoluting the respective

spectrum with the function α

dic

(E), obtained previously by

microdosimetric calculations.

The same depth-dependent photon spectra were used to

determine

nanodosimetric

quantities by Geant4-DNA

calculations. For each initial photon track, target volumes

in size of one DNA convolution which experienced at least

4 ionizations (F4) were identified. Such quantities were

previously shown to describe the DSB yield. Based on the

average minimum distance between these volumes within

each photon track, the RBE was estimated by

normalization to the distance for Co-60 at 0.125 mm

depth.