Background Image
Previous Page  102 / 128 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 102 / 128 Next Page
Page Background

EuroWire – September 2007

100

english

The components consist of the following:

Filler/Bedding

: Extruded halogen free

non-hydroscopic polymeric bedding or

optional non-hydroscopic filler yarns.

Polymeric Protection

:

Impact resistant,

shock absorbing extruded polymer capable

of reducing risk of permanent deformation

and damage to the underlying core.

Metallic

Shield

:

Copolymer

coated

aluminium tape longitudinally applied

with sealed overlap.

Polymeric Layer

: Extruded layer bonded

to the underlying metallic shield barrier.

This combination is resistant to aggressive

chemicals such as hydrocarbons, solvents,

acids, bases and moisture.

Sheath

: Extruded overall low temperature,

flame and sunlight resistant polyvinyl

chloride or low smoke halogen free jacket.

3. Performance of

polymeric armour

3.1 Impact Performance

Comparative impact testingwas conducted

in apparatus designed in accordance with

EDF Specification HN 33-S-52

[5]

. The test

was conducted at different energy impact

levels and employed an impact tool of a

90° V shaped wedge with 80mils (2mm)

radius tip.

After a single impact at the specified

energy level, the thicknesses of various

layers and local damage on the extruded

insulation shield – by means of an optical

laser system – was measured with an

electronic digital caliber.

Testing continued on the three conductor

2/0 AWG 15kV rated cables employing

polymeric

armour

and

continuous

corrugated

aluminium

armour

to

determine the magnitude of impact on

each design that resulted in the same level

of damage on the ethylene propylene

rubber (EPR) insulated conductor. This

was determined to be an impact level

of 200 joules for the polymeric armour

design as compared to 140 joules for the

continuous and corrugated aluminium

metal clad cable design.

Further testing on three conductor

350 kcm 15 kV rated cables found the

impact magnitude that resulted in the

equivalent level damage on the insulation

shield of the EPR insulated conductor was

250 joules for the polymeric armour and

200 joules for the continuous & corrugated

aluminium metal clad cable design.

Impact testing was also conducted on

typical 600 volts rated control cables.

The typical cable configuration of nine

conductors #12 AWG conductor cables

was employed. The testing apparatus

and impact tool design were identical

as employed for impact testing of the

15kV power cable sizes.

This technology has also been adopted

in communications and optical fibre

cable designs for terrestrial and aerial

applications replacing metallic armour/

sheaths as successfully demonstrated in

power and control cables. The severity

of an 80 joules impact can easily be

seen in

Figure 6

. At this impact level the

measured damage on the insulated core

is two times greater on the continuous

corrugated aluminium armour than

the

polymeric

armour.

This

can

be seen in

Figure 8

where exposure of

the #12 AWG conductors through the

insulation was observed.

The criticality of such exposure is the

potential to lose circuit integrity via phase-

to-phase or phase-to-armour and poten-

tially short circuiting and loss of power to

critical equipment and instrumentation

in an industrial or commercial facility. The

insulation within the core of the polymeric

armour cable, while exhibiting some

damage, is not in jeopardy of a phase-to-

phase short circuit.

3.2 Sidewall Bearing

Pressure Performance

Sidewall Bearing Pressure (SWBP) develops

when a cable is pulled around a bend

under pulling tension. It is the vector sum

of the sidewall pressure due to tension in

the conductor acting horizontally, and the

weight of the conductor acting vertically.

SWBP should always be calculated for

that conductor that presses hardest on

the inside bend of the curvature, ie, pipe,

conduct, wheel, etc.

In most cases sidewall bearing pressure

limits for power cable have been demon-

strated to be quite satisfactory via 30 to

50 years of historical data. These were

initially based upon theoretical methods

and consequently, safety factors were

incorporated in the equations. Currently,

North American standards do not define

a test protocol for determination of

sidewall bearing pressure.

Polymeric armour

Continuous corrugated

aluminium armour

Figure 4

:

Polymeric armour and continuous corrugated Al armour - 3/C 350 kcm 15 KV- after 250 joules of Impact

Figure 5

:

Illustrated damage on insulation shield

with copper tape removed

Figure 6

:

Polymeric armour and continuous

corrugated Al armour – 9/C #12 AWG 600 V cables –

after 80 joules of impact and overall jacket removed

Figure 7

:

9/C #12 AWG insulated core removed

from polymeric armour design after 80 Joules

impact

Figure 8

:

9/C #12 AWG insulated core removed

from continuous corrugated Al armour after

80 Joules impact