Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  71 / 154 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 71 / 154 Next Page
Page Background

3.  Is there information 

demonstrating that the method 

performs within the SMPR Method 

Preformance Requiements table 

specifications for all analytes in the 

SMPR applicability statement?  If 

not, please specify what is missing 

and whether or not the method's 

applicaiblity should be modified.  

LOQs reported:

0.92 ug/mL (0.09%) for BDMC 

1.33 ug/mL (0.13%) for DMC

2.86 ug/mL (0.29%) for CUR

SMPR states 0.1%; met for BDMC, slightly high for DMC, high for CUR.  *Calculations 

to % done without inclusion of methanol density, which would actually make them 

higher and further from requirement

No recovery information provided.

Analytical ranges reported: 

0.09‐1.66% for BDMC (0.6‐15 ug/mL cal range)

0.39‐10.3% for DMC (1.7‐42 ug/mL cal range)

0.00016‐25.2% for CUR (4‐100 ug/mL cal range)

SMPR requests 0.1% to >50%; based on levels in products and the calibration ranges 

demonstrated, I have no concern about this method working in this range.  

RSDrs for one BDMC test, one CUR test, and 3 DMC tests are outside of the range in 

SMPR (LT 5% at 0.1‐50%; LT 3% at >50%).  Values range from 6‐7%.  6 samples were 

tested.

1.  Based on the supporting 

information, were there any 

additional steps in the evaluation 

of the method that indicated the 

need for any addional 

precautionary statements in the 

method?

No

2.  Does the method contain 

system suitability tests or controls 

as specified by the SMPR?  If not, 

please indicate if there is a need 

for such tests or controls, and 

which ones.

No

3.  Is there information 

demonstrating that the method 

system suitability tests and 

controls as specified in the SMPR 

worked appropriately and as 

expected?  If no, please specify.

N/A

4.  Based on the supporting 

information, is the method written 

clearly and concisely?  If no, please 

specify the needed revisions.

Yes

5.  Based on the supporting 

information, what are the 

pros/strenghts of the method?

The method is straightforward and relatively simple.  It has been tested on a number 

of matrices (as suggested in Table 3 of SMPR) and in the presence of numerous 

other botanicals (including 2 from Table 2 of SMPR).

IV.  General Submission Package