Previous Page  117 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 117 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

APRIL

1986

INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY OF IRELAND

GAZETTE

Vol. No. 80 No. 4

In this issue . . .

Comment 107 Mediation in Family Disputes 109 Mediation — Professional and Practice Issues . . . I l l State Family Mediation Service 114 Practice Notes 116 Minutes of the Half-Yearly Meeting 119

Mixed Soccer Tournament

120

Ladies Golfing Society

120

Presentation of Parchments 122 Mayo Bar Association 124 Dáil Debates 125

Fatal Injuries and Title to Sue

126

Irish Solicitor Appears before Privy Council 130 Book Reviews 131 Correspondence 133 Professional Information 134

Executive Editor:

Mary Buckley

Editorial Board:

William Earley, Chairman

John F. Buckley

Gary Byrne

Geraldine Clarke

Michael V. O'Mahony

Maxwell Sweeney

Advertising:

Liam O hOisin, Telephone 305236

Printing:

Turner's Printing Co. Ltd., Longford

The views expressed in this publication, save where other-

wise indicated, are the views of the contributors and not

necessarily the views of the Council of the Society.

The appearance of an advertisement in this publication

does not necessarily indicate approval by the Society for

the product or service advertised.

Published at Blackhall Place, Dublin 7.

MAY 1986

Commen t . ..

. . . Family Mediation Service

T

he Minister for State at the Department of Justice

with responsibility for Women's Affairs, Ms. Nuala

Fennell, has recently approved the appointment of a co-

ordinator for the new state funded Family Mediation

Service. The service has also acquired a premises in

Dublin, and is about to commence training at least four

mediators, selected from, it is believed 172 applicants,

most of high quality. This must be an optimistic

beginning for what is undoubtedly, for the legal

profession a desirable development.

For too long, solicitors practising in the family law

area have been conscious of their lack of professional

competence to deal with the 'emotional' ingredient in

such cases, which tends to blur the parties' capacity to

look logically at what the law and the legal process can

or cannot hope to achieve. Articles in this issue seek to

define what mediation is all about. What it is not is

'marriage counselling' which is about helping a couple

to reconcile their differences so that the marriage will

continue. What it is, in summary, is the attempt by the

two parties to a marriage, which has irreparably broken

down, to work out their differences, with the assistance

of a mediator with lawyers then coming in to formalise

any agreements reached, covering such matters as

custody of children, maintenance and ownership of

property.

The purpose of mediation is not simply to reduce the

pain associated with the breakdown of marriage. While

a mediation process may, and if well conducted should,

diminish the pain associated with the breakdown of

marriage, its primary function is to help the couple

concerned to rearrange their lives, following the

breakdown of the marriage, and to renegotiate their

continuing relationships, on a basis that will be tailor-

made to both the present and the future needs of the

couple themselves and any children of the marriage.

Those who favour the mediation process as a means of

resolving confrontation between spouses, believe that

mediation, in which the parties, with the assistance of a

mediator work out their own agreements, should

produce a better solution, and a better relationship for

the future, than would be produced where the parties

delegate the negotiation function to others, for example

their lawyers. In countries where mediation has been

tested (e.g. U.S. and Canada) it has been found that the

mediated agreements tend to be more lasting and

(continued on p. 110).

107