110
ACQ
Volume 13, Number 3 2011
ACQ
uiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing
McKay, G. (1996).
The land still speaks
. Canberra:
Australian Government Publishing Service.
Oetting, J. B., & Cleveland, L. H. (2006). The clinical utility
of nonword repetition for children living in the rural south of
the US.
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
,
20
(7–8), 553–561.
Paradis, J. (2010). The interface between bilingual
development and specific language impairment.
Applied
Psycholinguistics
,
31
, 227–252.
Paradis, J., Crago, M., Genesee, F., & Rice, M. (2003).
French-English bilingual children with SLI: How do they
compare with their monolingual peers?
Journal of Speech,
Language, and Hearing Research
,
46
(1), 113–127.
Paradis, J., Emmerzael, K., & Duncan, T. (2010).
Assessment of English language learners: Using parent
report on first language development.
Journal of
Communication Disorders
,
43
, 474–497. doi: 10.1016/j.
jcomdis.2010.01.002
Pauwels, A., (2005). Maintaining the community language
in Australia: Challenges and roles for families.
International
Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
,
8
(2 & 3),
124–131.
Peña, E. (2000). Measurement of modifiability in children
from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.
Communication Disorders Quarterly
,
21
(2), 87–97.
Kohnert, K., Windsor, J., & Ebert, K. (2009). Primary
or ‘specific’ language impairment and children learning a
second language.
Brain and Language
,
109
, 101–111.
Kohnert, K., Windsor, J., & Yim, D. (2006). Do language-
based processing tasks separate children with language
impairment from typical bilinguals?
Learning Disabilities
Research & Practice
,
21
(1), 19–29.
Langdon, H. W., & Wiig, E. H. (2009). Multicultural issues
in test interpretation.
Seminars in Speech and Language
,
30
(4), 261–278.
Lewis, N., Castilleja, N., Moore, B. J., & Rodriguez,
B. (2010). Assessment 360: A panoramic framework for
assessing English language learners.
Perspectives on
Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and
Linguistically Diverse Populations
,
17
, 37–56.
Malcolm, I., Haig, Y., Konigsber, P., Rochecouste, J.,
Collard, G., Hill, A., & Cahill, R. (1999).
Two way English.
Towards more user-friendly education for speakers of
Aboriginal English
. Perth: Education Department of Western
Australia.
May, A. & Williams, C. (2011).
Using parent report for
assessment of first language of English Language Learners
.
Manuscript submitted for publication.
Appendix: A framework for assessment
Type of assessment
Evidence provided
Evidence supports possible
normal processes
speech/language learning
of language
disability
disability
development
Developmental history
Acquisition of early language and non-
language skills
• like siblings
• typical developmental milestones
Medical history
• no hospitalisations, known conditions
• early, frequent ear infections
Family history
• history of speech/language impairment
Language use
• Patterns of language use at home, with
significant others, friends
• Length of exposure to English
• Language preferences in different contexts
Dynamic assessment
Ability to learn new tasks in structured
teaching environment
Language sampling
Connected speech in social/interactive
language tasks – English. L1 if feasible
Observations in classroom • Compare social and academic settings
and with peers
• Pragmatics
• Language preferences
Norm referenced
• Quantitative comparison of child’s language
assessment
with typically developing bilingual peers
• Assessed in high structured, school type
tasks
Academic history
Information about academic instruction
• in and outside Australia
• stable or interrupted
• language of instruction
• support provided for development of English
Academic progress
• similar/dissimilar to ELL peers
Source: Adapted from Lewis, Castilleja, Moore, & Rodriguez, 2010
All children
School-aged children only