Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  139 / 185 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 139 / 185 Next Page
Page Background

139

2007 Best Practices Study | Agencies with Revenues Between $10,000,000 and $25,000,000 | Technology

Agencies with Revenues Between $10,000,000 and $25,000,000

Appendix

Insurance

Carriers

Technology

Service

Staff Info

Producer

Info

Employee

Overview

Financial

Stability

Revenues/

Expenses

Executive

Perspectives

Profile

Technology

1

Includes hardware/software leasing including offsite applications, supplies, maintenance & maintenance contracts, training, data lines, internet providers,

website development/maintenance, outside consulting fees, computer depreciation, software amortization, and any non-depreciated hardware/software.

AMS360 3.3%

Vision 6.7%

AMS-afw 6.7%

Other 3.3%

TAM 46.7%

Sagitta 33.3%

Agency Management

System Utilized

Average

Top 25%

Information Technology FTE

Number

2.0

High

4.0

Low

0.3

Total IT Payroll Expense ($)

$133,233

$199,828

As % of Total Compensation Expense

1.5%

As % of Net Revenues

0.9%

Average

+25% Profit

+25% Growth

Total IT Expenses for Fiscal Year

1.9%

1.5%

1.5%

Scanning & Document Management

% of Agencies that Use

86.7%

% of Users That:

Use ams for Document Management

60.0%

Use 3rd Party for Document Management

46.7%

Do Front-end (mail room) Batch Scanning 16.7%

Do Back-end (after CSR) Scanning

70.0%

Website

% of Agencies that Have

100.0%

% of Websites That:

Are More than Electronic Yellow Page

63.6%

Used in Prospecting/Sales Efforts

40.0%

Optimized for Search Engines

43.3%

Participate in “Paid” search Programs

26.7%

Is Key Component in Customer

Service Efforts

43.3%

Extend Customer Self-Service

Through Site

53.3%

Used as Vehicle to Provide Helpful

Info and Educate

73.3%

“Had we not made the investments

we’ve made in technology and training,

I hate to think where we’d be in this

soft market. Remarkably, we struggled

big-time at the time we were writing

those checks – it seemed like so much

money. Today, we can do so much

more with far fewer people, on a per-

employee basis anyway.”