Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  82 / 168 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 82 / 168 Next Page
Page Background

2015 Best

Practices Study

Agencies

with Revenues

Between

$5,000,000 and

$10,000,000

82

Analysis of Agencies with Revenues Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000

Key Benchmarks

Profile

Revenues

Expenses

Profitability

Employee Overview

Producer Info

Service Staff Info

Technology

Insurance Carriers

Appendix

Note: See page 163 for an explanation of column headings

AVERAGE TOTAL REVENUES: $7,242,280

Average

Top 25% Pro!t Top 25%Growth

Population Density of Metropolitan AreasWhere Home O!ce is Located

Less than 50,000

25.7%

12.5%

12.5%

50,000 – 250,000

25.7%

37.5%

25.0%

250,000 – 1,000,000

14.3%

12.5%

25.0%

More than 1,000,000

34.3%

37.5%

37.5%

Corporate Structure

C

17.1%

25.0%

12.5%

S

62.9%

62.5%

50.0%

Partnership

5.7%

12.5%

25.0%

LLC

14.3%

0.0%

12.5%

Sole Proprietorship

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Average # of Agency Locations

(Main & Branch O!ces)

3.2

2.9

2.9

Total Square Footage of Office Space

13,569

10,995

11,894

# of States in which Offices are Located

2.3

1.0

1.0

% of Agencies with an ESOP

8.6%

25.0%

12.5%

% of Stock Owned by ESOP

73.1%

59.7%

100.0%

Shareholders

Number of Shareholders (excluding ESOP)

4.1

4.2

3.4

High

8.0

Low

1.0

% Owned by Largest Shareholder

56.0%

50.6%

57.5%

High

100.0%

Low

20.0%

Current Age of Largest Shareholder

61.4

63.6

62.7

% of Agencies Owned by Another Corporation

12.4%

Description of Parent Corporation

Other included insurance company.

Financial Institution

50.0%

National Broker

25.0%

Other

25.0%

Member of Group

% of Agencies Belonging to a Franchise, Cluster,

Alliance/Network or Aggregator Group

34.3%

Groups included Combined Agents

of America, Northern United Agents

Alliance, Intersure, Assurex Global,

Keystone Insurers Group, Bene"ts

Advisors Network, Insurors Group of

Texas, PIIB, Insurors Group, New Jersey

Agency Partners, Insurance & Risk

Managers.

Pro!le

(of Agencies in this Study Group)