Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  110 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 110 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Morgan Hill, California

104

Zucker Systems

Challenge other department conditions when they appear inappropriate;

Act as a single point of contact for the applicant to resolve issues that arise

during the multi-departmental review process;

Analyze the project to ensure consistency with regulations, policies and long-

range plans;

Coordinate with key decision-makers;

Write and sign staff reports that provide decision-makers with a professional

recommendation with enforceable conditions of approval that mitigate issues;

Present concise, formal PowerPoint presentations of the project at public

meetings.

Sign off on building plans prior to building permit issuance;

Conduct site inspection to verify required improvements have been constructed

prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy; and

Conduct field reviews of the project six months to a year after Certificate of

Occupancy is granted to determine if approvals were satisfactory or if

unintended impacts have occurred, which requires code or process

adjustments.

Currently, planning staff performs most of these functions, but as noted above

some are not being performed.

116.

Recommendation:

The Community Development Director should

empower the current planners to perform all of the functions described above

through formal policy and intra and inter-departmental agreement (e.g.,

agree planners are the lead, and act as projects managers, etc., with other

divisions and departments involved in the permitting process and that staff

will be held accountable to perform as agreed).

Staffing

Overview

Table 18 below shows the full-time equivalent (FTE) staffing resource for the last 6

fiscal years.