Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  140 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 140 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Morgan Hill, California

134

Zucker Systems

planner to lead the discussion of their assigned project at DRC so that issues can be

highlighted and discussed and the planner can act to facilitate decision-making among

the interdisciplinary DRC team when needed.

140.

Recommendation:

The DRC should continue to be chaired by the

Senior Planner, but Planners should attend DRC meetings to lead the

discussion of their project as a Project Manager, highlight issues and

facilitate decision-making and challenge conditions of approval when needed,

and ensure applicants are provided with decisive feedback to help eliminate

the need for multiple review cycles.

The DRC is comprised of a cross-functional review team consisting the Fire Marshal,

Building Division Technician, Associate Engineer, Police Analyst and Chemical

Control Specialist. The Housing Division and Economic Development are invited

participants, but do not attend regularly. In addition, it was reported that some

members, such as Engineering are frequently not fully prepared, in that they have not

yet completed their written comments and/or conditions, which are supposed to be

sent directly to the assigned planner and MSA for filing.

141.

Recommendation:

The City Manager should direct all designated

DRC participants to attend each meeting and arrive fully prepared with

written comments and conditions that they are prepared to discuss.

DRC meetings are held weekly (e.g., Wednesdays), which is good. However, staff

stated that agendas are not prepared for meetings and that projects are often scheduled

for two consecutive DRC meetings.

Staff noted that some projects are scheduled for two DRC meetings due to the lag

time between project submittal and the Director assignment. Since the Director

assigns projects at the Tuesday staff meeting, there can be up to a one-week lag time

between submittal and assignment of the project to a planner. So as a courtesy, the

Senior Planner in charge of the DRC takes unassigned projects to the DRC to

introduce them so the DRC members are aware that the project has been submitted

and will be discussed at next week’s meeting.

Earlier in this section, we recommend that projects immediately be assigned rather

than waiting to assign them at staff meetings, which will eliminate the lag time issue.

In addition, the practice of requiring the Senior Planner in charge of DRC to schedule

projects at a DRC for introduction only is unnecessary. In best practice communities,

projects are scheduled for one DRC within two weeks of the submittal in order give