Previous Page  46 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 46 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

In recent years, the technology of

3D integration has evolved into an

economically interesting road. In

particular, the technology is used

to package the CMOS imagers you

find in your smartphone, the high-

bandwidth DRAM memory stacks

used in high-end com-puting but

also in advanced graphics cards.

3D integration allows a significant

reduction of a system’s footprint,

and enables ever shorter and faster

connections between that system’s

sub-components. Rather than

stacking chips, it is also possible to

rep-artition a 2D systems-on-chip

(2D-SOC) design into circuit blocks,

realized in separate wafers that are

stacked and tightly intercon-nected.

This is called 3D systems-on-chip

(3D-SOC). By clever partitioning of

the circuits, the power-performance-

area can be significantly improved,

providing a path to extend Moore’s

law scaling.

3D systems-on-chip: a clever partition-ing of circuits to

improve area, cost, power and performance

Dr. Mieke Van Bavel

The 3D technology

landscape

The

continued

scaling

of

microelectronic circuits has allowed

the crea-tion of extremely complex

systems-on-chip (SOC). At the same

time, several specific applications

(such as high density memory,

high voltage, analog signaling and

sensors) have driven technology

developments in various directions.

In this complex landscape, on

the one hand, many electronic

systems still consist of a multitude

of components that are packaged

individually and interconnected

using conventional printed circuit

boards. On the other hand, more

advanced 3D integration and

interconnect technologies have

emerged, reducing the size of the

electronic systems, and enabling

faster and shorter connections

between their sub-circuits. These

abilities have made 3D integration

one of the techniques that will

allow the industry to keep pace with

Moore’s Law.

In this 3D technology landscape,

several classes of 3D integration

can be defined. The main difference

between these classes is related

to the level of partitioning, in

other words: at which level in the

interconnect hierarchy the systems

are ‘cut’ into different pieces. Each

of these clas-ses requires different

process schemes and 3D integration

techniques, achieving progressively

smaller contact pitches. A first class

is what we call system-in-a-package

(or SiP), where the partitioning is

done at package level – by stacking

packages on top of each other, or by

inte-grating multiple die in a single

package. Among the technologies

used to realize SiPs are package-to-

package reflow and fan-out wafer

46 l New-Tech Magazine Europe