Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1201 / 1578 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1201 / 1578 Next Page
Page Background

IMRT / VMAT with SIB in Patients with Brain Oligometastases

Author

Endpoint

PTV wb/dose

PTV m/dose

Cases

(lesions)

Main findings

Bauman

2007

WBRT +SIB (HT) vs

WBRT + conventional

SRT

30 (60)

14 (1-3)

SIB HT is a feasible alternative for SRT

on small volume

Edwards

2010

WBRT + SIB(HT)

30 (40)

11 (1-4)

WBRT + SIB (HT) is feasible without

adverse effects

Hsu

2010

WBRT + SIB (VMAT) vs

SRT

32.23 (63-70.8)

10 (1-3)

SIB-VMAT plans achieve adequate

WBRT coverage with conformal

hippocampal avoidance and RS quality

dose distributions

Rodrigues

2011

WBRT+

SIB (HT)

30 (35-60)

48 (1-3)

60 Gy in 10 fract. To 1-3 brain

metastases synchronously with 30 Gy

WBRT

Nichol

2016

WBRT +VRS

20 (47.5 to

metastases, 38 to 2

mm PTV)

60 (223)

47.5 Gy in 5 fract.. Volumetric RS was

effective for long term control

Ferro

2017

WBRT + SIB (IMRT)

30 (35-50)

30 (1-5)

50 Gy in 10 fract. To 1-5 brain

metastases synchron. With 30 Gy

WBRT is feasible with IMRT