Background Image
Previous Page  104 / 552 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 104 / 552 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Philadelphia – 2015

102

SC28

28-Room 405, Marriott

Market Design

Cluster: Auctions

Invited Session

Chair: Gabriel Weintraub, Professor, Columbia University, Uris Hall,

New York, NY, 10027, United States of America,

gyw2105@columbia.edu

1 - Incentive Issues in Paired Organ Donation

Eduardo Azevedo, Assistant Professor, Wharton, 3620 Locust

Walk, Wharton, SHDH 1400, Philadelphia, PA, 19102,

United States of America,

eazevedo@wharton.upenn.edu

,

Nikhil Agarwal, Itai Ashlagi, Clayton Featherstone

In the last few years a new type of organ donation has arisen. In a paired kidney

exchange two recipients with incompatible live donors receive organs from each

other’s live donor. Sometimes transactions involve more recipients and/or donors.

While many exchanges happen in a decentralized way, others happen in large

centralized exchanges. We empirically examine how agents in these markets

respond to incentives and whether incentives are misaligned with social goals.

2 - Optimal Procurement Mechanisms for Differentiated Products

Gabriel Weintraub, Professor, Columbia University, Uris Hall,

New York, NY, 10027, United States of America,

gyw2105@columbia.edu,

Daniela Saban

We study the mechanism design problem faced by a buyer that selects an

assortment of differentiated products and unit prices from a set of suppliers with

private costs. Then, consumers can choose their most preferred product from this

set. The buyer maximizes consumer surplus; to do so, he must balance the trade-

off between variety and price competition. We characterize the optimal

mechanism and use these results to analyze practical mechanisms.

3 - Efficiency and Stability in Large Matching Markets

Yeon-koo Che, Columbia University, 420 West 118th Street,

1029 IAB, New York, NY, United States of America,

yeonkooche@gmail.com

, Olivier Tercieux

We study efficient and stable mechanisms in matching markets when the number

of agents is large and individuals’ preferences and priorities are drawn randomly.

When agents’ preferences are correlated over objects, the prevailing mechanisms

are either inefficient or unstable even in the asymptotic sense. We propose a

variant of deferred acceptance which is asymptotically efficient, asymptotically

stable and also asymptotically incentive compatible.

4 - Market Fragmentation

Rakesh Vohra, University of Pennsylvania, 3718 Locust Walk,

Philadelphia, PA, United States of America,

rvohra@seas.upenn.edu,

Ahmad Peivandi

Centralized markets reduce the costs of search for buyers and sellers. Their

`thickness’ increases the chance of of order execution at competitive prices. In

spite of the incentives to consolidate, some markets, have fragmented into

multiple trading venues. We argue in this paper that fragmentation is an

unavoidable feature of any centralized exchange. Our argument introduces a new

way to think about participation in a mechanism when the outside option is

endogenous.

SC29

29-Room 406, Marriott

Joint Session Analytics/CPMS: Panel Discussion

on OR vs Analytics: Experts Weigh in on the

Case for Change

Sponsor: Analytics/CPMS

Sponsored Session

Chair: Glenn Wegryn, Principal, Analytic Impact LLC, 7555 De Mar Rd,

Cincinnati, OH, 45243, United States of America,

gwegryn@gmail.com

1 - Panel Discussion on OR vs Analytics: Experts Weigh in on the

Case for Change

Moderator: Glenn Wegryn, Principal, Analytic Impact LLC, 7555

De Mar Rd, Cincinnati, OH, 45243, United States of America,

gwegryn@gmail.com

, Panelists: Robert Rose, Anne Robinson,

Jack Levis, Don Kleinmuntz, Thornton May, David Dittmann,

Jeffrey Camm

Operations Research? Management Science? Analytics? What’s in a brand name?

How has the emerging field of Analytics impacted the Operations Research

Profession? Is Analytics part of OR or the other way around? Is it good, bad,

relevant, a nuisance or an opportunity for the OR profession? Is OR just

Prescriptive or is it something more? In this panel discussion, we will explore

these topics in a session with some of the leading thinkers in both OR and

Analytics. Be sure to attend to have your questions answered on these highly

complementary and valuable fields.

SC30

30-Room 407, Marriott

Creating and Sustaining an Analytics Advantage

Sponsor: CPMS

Sponsored Session

Chair: Peter Bell, Ivey Business School at Western University, 1255

Western Road, London, ON, N6G 0N1, Canada,

pbell@ivey.uwo.ca

1 - Advanced Analytics at Verizon Wireless Supply Chain

Anne Robinson, Verizon Wireless,

anne.robinson@verizonwireless.com

, Mustafa Dogru

Supply Chain Advanced Analytics Team carries out projects in the areas of

forecasting, inventory optimization, assortment planning, etc. We give an

overview of our engagement approach with the internal business units, discuss

how our models are implemented and transferred to the business, and conclude

with the lessons learned.

2 - Capability Portfolio Analyses Tool (CPAT)

Pooja Dewan, BNSF Railway, Fort Worth TX 76092,

United States of America,

Pooja.Dewan@bnsf.com

The Capability Portfolio Analyses Tool (CPAT) delivers unparalleled insight into

multi-decadal modernization planning for the Army’s large ground combat fleet.

This first-of-its-kind capability optimizes modernization plans while considering

the complex interrelationship between performance, budgets, schedules,

production capacities, etc. Over 40 studies have been completed- informing

stakeholders up to Army Vice Chief of Staff, OSD, and Army Acquisition

Executive levels.

3 - The Analytics Advantage: Some Reflections from Business

and Policy-making

Doug Samuelson, InfoLogix, Inc., 8711 Chippendale Court,

Annandale, VA, 22003, United States of America,

samuelsondoug@yahoo.com

Analytics / OR / MS (or whatever we want to call it) involves injecting more

intellectual rigor into decision-making. Key elements of how to do this include

using the decision-makers’ language, understanding their needs and time frame,

and building multiple constituencies of decision-makers who trust your

recommendations. This is not as obvious in practice as it sounds in summary.

4 - Sustaining an Analytics Advantage

Peter Bell, Ivey Business School at Western University,

1255 Western Road, London, ON, N6G 0N1, Canada,

pbell@ivey.uwo.ca

Many claim that the use of analytics can create a competitive advantage but

research suggests that any advantage created is often fleeting: most analytics is

easily replicated. There are, however, examples of firms that have sustained a

competitive advantage through analytics for years, even decades. How have they

done this? What are the lessons for analytics leaders? This presentation will

provide examples that may provide lessons on how to sustain an advantage

created through analytics.

SC31

31-Room 408, Marriott

Interactions Between Learning and Decision Making

Sponsor: Data Mining

Sponsored Session

Chair: Theja Tulabandhula, Xerox Research Centre India, Bangalore,

Bangalore, India,

theja2t@gmail.com

1 - The Forest or the Trees? Tackling Simpson’s Paradox with

Classification and Regression Trees

Galit Shmueli, Professor, National Tsing Hua University, Institute

of Service Science, 101, Sec. 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu, 30013,

Taiwan - ROC,

galit.shmueli@gmail.com

, Inbal Yahav

Social science research often uses observational data to study causality because

randomized experiments are impossible, unethical or expensive. Simpson’s

paradox arises in observational causal studies, due to confounders. We propose

using Classification & Regression Trees to detect Simpson’s paradox in large

observational data. The approach relies on the tree structure and the location of

the cause vs. the confounders in the tree. We illustrate our approach on several

real applications.

SC28