Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  421 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 421 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S406

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

PO-0767 Revisiting EPID design for modern

radiotherapy requirements

P. Vial

1,2

, S. Blake

2,3

, Z. Cheng

2,3

, S. Deshpande

1,4

, S.

Atakaramians

5

, M. Lu

6

, S. Meikle

7

, P. Greer

8,9

, Z. Kuncic

2

1

Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres and

Ingham Institute, Department of Medical Physics,

Liverpool BC, Australia

2

University of Sydney, Institute of Medical Physics-

School of Physics, Sydney, Australia

3

Ingham Institute, Medical Physics, Liverpool, Australia

4

University of Wollongong, Centre for Medical Radiation

Physics, Wollongong, Australia

5

University of Sydney, Institute of Photonics and Optical

Science- School of Physics, Sydney, Australia

6

Perkin Elmer, Medical Imaging, Santa Clara, USA

7

University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences & Brain

and Mind Centre, Sydney, Australia

8

University of Newcastle, School of Mathematical and

Physicsal Sciences, Newcastle, Australia

9

Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Radiation Oncology,

Newcastle, Australia

Purpose or Objective

New methods of treatment verification that are in keeping

with advances in radiotherapy technology are desirable.

The availability of kilovoltage in-room imaging for

example has led to a general trend away from the poorer

contrast megavoltage (MV) imaging for patient-set-up.

The widespread use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy

(IMRT) also reduces the utility of treatment beams as a

source of imaging for treatment verification. At the same

time there has been a steady increase in the use of

electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) for dose

verification. There is however emerging evidence of new

roles for MV imaging in real-time target tracking. In this

work we address the issue of EPID detector specifications

in light of changing clinical requirements. We present a

general overview of the detector development work our

group has undertaken to design an EPID that better

supports applications relevant to current and future

clinical practice.

Material and Methods

Prototype EPID technologies developed by our group

include: a direct detector EPID where the metal/phosphor

screen has been replaced by a water equivalent build-up

material [1]; a dual detector combining a standard EPID

and an array dosimeter [2]; and an EPID comprising a

plastic scintillator fibre array (PSFA) in place of the

metal/phosphor screen [3]. Our performance

specifications were to achieve imaging performance

equivalent to standard EPIDs, and a dose response

equivalent to standard clinical dosimeters. Quantitative

metrics such as detective quantum efficiency (DQE) for

imaging and field size response for dosimetry were used in

both experimental and Monte Carlo (MC) studies. There

are three arms to this project that shall be described; i)

MC simulations to characterise and design scintillators, ii)

Prototype construction and experimental evaluation, iii)

clinical implementation.

Results

All prototype detectors exhibited near equivalent dose

response with ionisation chambers in both non-transit and

transit geometries (± 2%), including 2D clinical dosimetry

of IMRT fields. The X-ray quantum efficiency of the direct

and PSFA detectors is approximately 9% compared to 2%

for the standard EPID and dual detector. The imaging

performance of the standard EPID and dual detector

remains superior to the other prototypes because of the

greater efficiency of optical photons detected per

incident X-ray and better spatial resolution. MC

simulations demonstrate potential improvements in

imaging with the PSFA. A model for clinical

implementation has been developed that exploits the

water equivalence of the detectors. A water equivalent

EPID provides more direct and robust verification than can

be achieved with current EPID dosimetry. A water

equivalent EPID that retains imaging capability is better

suited than current EPIDs for modern radiotherapy.

Conclusion

This work demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of

alternative EPID designs that better meet the needs of

modern radiotherapy.

PO-0768 Electron Paramagnetic Resonance signal from

a new solid polymer material aimed for 3D dosimetry

M.R. Bernal-Zamorano

1

, N.H. Sanders

1

, L. Lindvold

1

, C.E.

Andersen

1

1

DTU, Nutech, Roskilde, Denmark

Purpose or Objective

We have developed a water-equivalent solid polymer

dosimeter material aimed for 3D dosimetry in

radiotherapy beams. The material responds to ionizing

radiation by changes in its optical absorbance and by

generation of fluorescence centers. The latter signal is of

particular interest as the fluorescence centers facilitate

detailed mapping the 3D dose distribution us ing laser

stimulation. However, in addition to the optical si gnals

we also expect that the material could have an electron

paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dose response related to

the production of stable free radicals. To test this

hypothesis, point detector experiments were therefore

performed where the material was casted into 5 mm

diameter pellets identical in size to the alanine dosimeters

that we routinely use for reference EPR dosimetry in our

laboratory. The pellets of the new material and alanine

were irradiated in

60

Co beams and EPR signals were

recorded afterwards.

Material and Methods

The dosimeter is based in pararosaniline leuco dye, which

is chemically transformed into its dye-form by the effect

of radiation. The leuco dye is dissolved in a poly(ethylene

glycol) diacrylate matrix (PEGDA-575 g/mol) that contains

diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide (TPO)

used for photocuring. We cured the material in a mold

with a 395 nm LED for a few minutes. We made 4

cylindrical pellets of 4.75 mm diameter and 2.78 mm

thickness (same size than alanine dosimeters used in this

work).

Pellets of the new material and alanine were irradiated in

a

60

Co gamma source with a dose rate of about 8 Gy min

-1

.

They were given doses of 5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 75 and 100 Gy.

The EPR signal for both dosimeters was obtained by a

Bruker EMX-micro spectrometer by inserting the pellets

into the resonator in a quartz tube. Absorbance and

fluorescence signals of the pellets of our material were

measured with a Shimazdu UV-2700 spectrophotometer

and an Ocean Optics QE6500 spectrometer respectively.

Fluorescence was excited with a diode laser.

Results

A clear EPR signal was obtained for our material, and this

signal increased with dose. The peak-to-peak amplitude of

the EPR spectra are shown in the figures.

Although alanine and PEGDA have similar characteristics

in terms of its water equivalence (similar effective atomic

number, mass density and electronic density), their EPR

signal is very different.