Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  427 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 427 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S412

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Benderitter

1

, F. Milliat

2

1

Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear

Safety IRSN, Department of Radiobiology and

Epidemiology SRBE, Fontenay-aux-Roses- Paris, France

2

Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear

Safety IRSN, Department of Radiobiology and

Epidemiology SRBE- Research on Radiobiology and

Radiopathology Laboratory L3R, Fontenay-aux-Roses-

Paris, France

3

Institute for Radiobiological Protection and Nuclear

Safety IRSN, Department of external dosimetry SDE-

Ionizing Radiation Dosimetry Laboratory LDRI, Fontenay-

aux-Roses- Paris, France

Purpose or Objective

Since last three decades, the importance of the dosimetry

in radiobiology studies and the standardization of the

dosimetry protocols have been highlighted. Nevertheless,

most of time, it is very difficult to reproduce experiments

described on literature due to a lack of details in the

description of dosimetry protocols. As the main objective

of radiobiology is to establish links between doses and the

radiations-induced biological effects, well-defined

dosimetry protocols appear to be a crucial point within the

determination of experimental protocols.

In this context, detailed dosimetry protocols for cells

irradiation have been implemented on the Small Animal

Radiation Research Platform (SARRP). To support the

importance of all parameters described on dosimetry

protocols, manual protocol changes were performed by

modifying the cell growth medium volume and/or the

additional filtration for an irradiation at 80 kV. Impacts of

modifications of the physical dose induced by these

errors/protocols changes were studied on RBE (Relative

Biological Effectiveness) using the survival clonogenic

assay.

Material and Methods

In first, all parameters of the configuration setup (HT, HVL

…) have to be defined. Then, measurements of absolute

dosimetry with ionization chamber calibrated in air Kerma

free in air condition, converted then in water kerma free

in air, and relative dosimetry with EBT3 radiochromic films

were performed to determine dose rate and evaluate the

attenuation due to the cell growth medium in each

containers

used

for

cells

irr

adiation.

In order to evaluate the influence of the modific ation of

parameters like cell medium volume (1 or 9 mL I nstead

of 3 mL as the reference condition) and/or the additional

filtration, 6 plate wells containing EBT3 films with water

were used to determine the impact on the physical dose

at 80 kV. Then, experiments with rigorously the same

irradiation conditions were performed by replacing EBT3

films by HUVECs. The biological response of HUVECs was

assessed by using clonogenic assay.

Results

Characterization of the beam quality index in the range of

30 to 220 kV for copper and aluminum filtrations and the

homogeneity of the field size have been measured.

Then, impact of the cell culture volume and filtration have

been evaluated thanks to measurements with EBT3 films

and show a variation between 1 to 8% with the copper

filtration and 8 to 40% with aluminum filtration compared

to each reference condition. HUVECs cells irradiated in

the same conditions showed significant differences in cell

survival fraction, perfectly corroborating the dosimetric

changes observed on physical dose.

Conclusion

All together these results strongly support the fact that an

accurate dosimetry needs to be performed before an

experiment but also to cautiously follow all the defined

parameters for one condition of irradiation to avoid errors

in the dose delivered on the sample and to be able to

properly compare and interpret experiments.

PO-0778 New Razor silicon diode for Cyber Knife small

beam relative dosimetry: a multi-site evaluation

S. Russo

1

, L. Masi

2

, P.R. Dicarolo

3

, R. Doro

2

, E. De

Martin

4

, M.L. Fumagalli

4

, A.S. Martinotti

5

, A. Bergantin

5

,

E. Rondi

6

, S. Vigorito

6

, P. Mancosu

7

1

Aziend USL Toscana Centro, Fisica Sanitaria, Florence,

Italy

2

IFCA, Radiotherapy, Firenze, Italy

3

Medical Physycs, Meyer Children’s University Hospital-,

Florence, Italy

4

Istituto Besta, Radiotherapy, Milano, Italy

5

C.D.I., Radiotherapy, Milano, Italy

6

I. E. O., Radiotherapy, Milano, Italy

7

Humanitas Research Hospital, Medical Physics Unit of

Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy

Purpose or Objective

The aim of this work was to evaluate the suitability of a

new unshielded p-type silicon diode (Razor, IBA

Dosimetry, Germany) for relative small beams dosimetry

over different CyberKnife systems.

Material and Methods

Output Factors

(OFs) measurements with Razor detector

were performed by four Italian Radiotherapy Centers

equipped with CyberKnife units for field sizes ranging from

5 to 60 mm, defined by fixed circular collimators. Setup

conditions were 80 cm source to detector distance and 1.5

cm depth in water. Measurements were repeated by each

center with a PTW-60017 diode. Monte Carlo correction

factors reported in literature were applied to PTW-60017

measured data and corrected values were considered as a

reference.

Crossplane and inplane dose profiles ranging from 5-60 cm

fixed collimators were measured by Razor detector at a

depth of 10 cm in water and SSD 70 cm. The effective field

size (EFS), defined as EFS=, where A and B correspond to

the in- and cross-line FWHM, were calculated. Penumbra

20%- 80% was also evaluated.

This work has been conducted in the framework of the

Italian Association of Medical Physics (AIFM) SBRT working

group.

Results

Razor OFs measured for fixed collimators in the four

enrolled centers showed a variability (relative range)

decreasing from 1.2% to 0.4% for field sizes from 7.5 to 60

mm and equal to 2.2% for the smallest cone. The

variability obtained for OF measured by PTW-60017 was

analogous: lower than 1 % for field sizes from 7.5 to 60

mm and equal to 3.5% for the smallest diameter.

For field sizes down to 7.5 mm Razor measured OFs were

lower than PTW-60017 uncorrected measured values.

Relative differences between Razor OFs and Monte Carlo

corrected PTW-60017 data were below 1% for 60-10 mm

cone sizes and within 2 % for 7.5 mm field size over all

centers. For the smallest collimator differences ranging

from to 2.5% to 6% were observed among centers. Average

values and SD of OFs measured by Razor and PTW-60017

diode (MC corrected and not) are shown in figure.

Nominal field size NFS, effective field size EFS and

penumbra Razor measurements averaged over the four

CyberKnife centers are reported in table. Maximum