Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  423 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 423 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S408

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

the EGSnrc package, and 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 T magnetic fields

were applied.

Results

Fig. 1 shows the derived kernels K(x-ξ) without and with

magnetic field for the three detector densities and two

beam qualities. The shape of K(x-ξ) without magnetic field

has been discussed in Looe et al 2015 in terms of the

electron density of the detector material. The effect of

the magnetic field on the secondary electrons’

trajectories in a non-water equivalent medium is

manifested as a distortion of K(x-ξ). It is worth mentioning

that function K(x-ξ) for water with normal density (middle

panels) does not vary in the presence of a magnetic field,

and the shape of this function merely represents the

geometrical volume-averaging effect.

Fig. 1. Area normalized K(x-ξ) for the cylindrical detector

voxels of 'low”, 'normal”, and 'enhanced” density without

and with, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 T magnetic field.

Conclusion

It has been shown for the first time that the lateral dose

response functions K(x-ξ) of non-water equivalent

detectors will be distorted by a magnetic field, showing

asymmetrical detector response, even if the detector’s

construction is symmetrical. The distortions are attributed

to the differences in charged particle trajectories within

the detectors having electron density other than of normal

water. The effect of a magnetic field on a detector’s

response can be characterized by the area-normalized

convolution kernel K(x-ξ, y-η). As previously proposed

(Looe et al 2015), corrections based on the convolution

model can be applied to account for the detector’s volume

effect in the presence of magnetic field:

PO-0771 The dose response functions of an air-filled

ionization chamber in the presence of a magnetic field

B. Delfs

1

, D. Harder

2

, B. Poppe

1

, H.K. Looe

1

1

University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical

Campus Pius Hospital Carl von Ossietzky University,

Oldenburg, Germany

2

Prof em. Medical Physics and Biophysics, Georg August

University, Göttingen, Germany

Purpose or Objective

The development of therapeutic devices combining

clinical linear accelerators and MRI scanners for MR guided

radiotherapy leads to new challenges in the clinical

dosimetry since the trajectories of the secondary

electrons are influenced by the Lorentz force. In this

study, the lateral dose response functions of a clinical air-

filled ionization chamber in the presence of a magnetic

field were examined depending on beam quality and

magnetic field following the approach of a convolution

model (Looe

et al

2015, Harder

et al

2014).

Material and Methods

In the convolution model, the 1D lateral dose response

function

K

(

x-ξ

) is defined as the convolution kernel

transforming the true dose profile

D

(

ξ

) into the disturbed

signal profile

M

(

x

) measured with a detector. For an air-

filled ionization chamber, type T31021 (PTW Freiburg,

Germany), the lateral dose response functions were

determined by Monte-Carlo simulation using 0.25 mm wide

60

Co and 6 MV slit beams. The chamber was modelled

according to manufacturer’s detailed specification and

placed at 5 cm water depth in three different

orientations, i.e. axial, lateral and longitudinal. For each

chamber orientation, a magnetic field oriented

perpendicular to the beam axis was applied. Simulations

were performed for magnetic fields of 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5 T

using the EGSnrc package and the

egs_chamber

code.

To verify the simulation results, the lateral dose response

functions without magnetic field were compared against

measurements with a 5 mm wide collimated 6 MV photon

slit beam using tertiary lead blocks following the approach

of Poppinga

et al

2015.

Results

Fig. 1 shows good agreement between the simulated and

measured dose response functions

K

(

x-ξ

) of the

investigated ionization chamber in the three investigated

orientations. The structures of the measured functions are

not as evident as those of the simulated functions possibly

due different scanning step widths used in the experiment

and the calculation.

Fig. 2 shows the lateral dose response function

K

(

x-ξ

) with

and without magnetic field obtained exemplary for the

detector in lateral orientation. The distortion of the dose

response function

K

(

x-ξ

) corresponds to the change in the

trajectory lengths of the secondary electrons in the air of

the ionization chamber due to the Lorentz force, as

compared to the trajectories in a small sample of water.

Fig. 1. Area-normalized simulated and measured dose

response functions

K

(

x

-

ξ

)

Fig. 2. Area-normalized dose response functions

K

(

x

-

ξ

) for

the T31021 in lateral orientation for magnetic fields of 0,

0.5,1 and 1.5 T

Conclusion

The distortions of the lateral dose response function

K

(

x-

ξ

) will alter the measured signal profile

M

(

x

) of a detector

in magnetic field, as demonstrated in this study. The

variety of the possible combinations of detector

orientation and magnetic field direction and the strong

dependence of the distortion on the magnetic field

strength require careful consideration whenever a non-

water equivalent detector is used in magnetic field.