Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  426 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 426 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S411

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

detector was positioned in the dose minimum

below. Finally, the detector in air instead of water with

a PMMA cap fitted on top. A range of typically used

detectors were analyzed, namely a microDiamond, a

PinPoint ionization chamber, an EDGE diode, as well as

three shielded and three unshielded diode detectors. EBT3

Gafchromic film served as reference. Measurements were

carried out on a PRIMUS linac at a photon beam quality of

6 MV with field sizes between 0.8 and 10 cm.

Responses in the blocked field and the PMMA setup were

combined to calculate the response in the open square

fields. The results were interpolated to a general matrix

from which responses in any field could be calculated.

Examples of such fields were measured for comparison.

Results

A higher detector overresponse and increasing detector to

detector differences were observed when the primary

beam was blocked out, whereas almost identical response

was seen for all detectors in the primary beam. A

combination of the responses in those two setups in a

detector-dependent ratio reproduced the values obtained

in the open field geometry with less than 1% deviation for

all detectors studied and all quadratic field sizes. For

rectangular and offset fields the agreement is still almost

within 1 %. Only when the detector was close to the field

edge larger deviations occurred (fig. 2).

Conclusion

Detector responses in open fields could be calculated from

the response to scatter and in the primary beam with 1%

agreement in all studied square fields and for all studied

detectors. The calculation was extended to rectangular

and non-symmetric fields yielding results in agreement

with the measurements for a wide range of fields. This

method suggests a way to calculate correction factors for

arbitrary fields.

PO-0776 Thermoluminescence Characteristics of

Fabricated Ge Doped Optical Fibre for Radiotherapy

Dosimetry

M.S. Ahmad Fadzil

1

, N. Tamchek

2

, N.M. Ung

3

, A. Ariffin

4

,

N. Abdullah

5

, D.A. Bradley

6

, N. Mohd Noor

1

1

Universiti Putra Malaysia, Department of Imaging-

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Serdang,

Malaysia

2

Universiti Putra Malaysia, Department of Physics-

Faculty of Science, Serdang, Malaysia

3

University of Malaya, Clinical Oncology Unit- Faculty of

Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

4

University of Malaya, Department of Physics- Faculty of

Science, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

5

Malaysia Nuclear Agency, Medical Physics Group,

Kajang, Malaysia

6

University of Surrey, Department of Physics, Guildford,

United Kingdom

Purpose or Objective

The dosimetry characteristics of the fabricated

Germanium doped cylindrical fibre (CF) and flat fibres (FF)

were evaluated including linearity, repeatability, energy

dependence, dose rate dependence, angular dependence

and fading. The TL kinetic parameters of Ge-doped CF and

FF have been investigated using the computerized glow

curve deconvolution analysis.

Material and Methods

A screening process was carried out for the optical fibres

with 6 MV photon beam. Optical fibres with sensitivity out

of ±5% mean sensitivity value were discarded in order to

ensure the selected dosimeters have constant response.

The dosimetry characteristics tests were performed using

6 MV and 10 MV photon beams. The dosimeters were

irradiated with doses ranging from 1 Gy to 3 Gy with

several dose rates (100 MU/min up to 500 MU/min).

Fabricated perspex phantoms were used to study the

angular dependency of the optical fibres. Fading rate was

studied for 55 days post irradiation. The glow curves were

analyzed with a curve fitting computer program known as

WinGCF. The glow curves were deconvoluted into five

individual peaks in order to figure out the kinetic

parameters such as the maximum peak temperature

(

T

max

), peak integral (

PI

), activation energy (

E

a

) and

frequency factor.

Results

The screening result revealed that the coefficient of

variation was observed to be less than ±10% for CF and FF.

Both CF and FF were found to be linear with r

2

more than

0.99 over the entire dose range explored for both 6 MV and

10 MV photon beams. These fibres provide consistent

reading within ±5% over five repeated measurements. The

signal lost was higher in FF (57%) compare to CF (38%) after

55 days of irradiation. Both fibres also offer dose rate- and

angular independence. The glow curve for both CF and FF

consist of 5 individual glow peaks. The peak height

increased with increasing irradiation dose. The T

max

of the

glow peaks (P1 to P5) is consistent over the dose range

used

.

Peak 1 has the lowest E

a

which lies between 0.544

to 0.636 eV and 0.632 to 0.720 eV for CF and FF

respectively, indicating the shallow electron traps. The

results also revealed that the PI for both of the fibres will

increase as the dose increase. The Ge-doped CF and FF

demonstrated a constant glow curves shape with

increasing dose. As the dose increases, area under the

glow curve increases, suggesting an increasing number of

electrons released from its traps.

Conclusion

CF demonstrated greater TL signal compared to FF. In

order to employ these optical fibres in absorbed dose

measurement, correction factors for energy dependence

and fading should be applied. The Ge-doped CF and FF

demonstrated the second-order kinetic model to the high

temperature half of the curve is slightly broader than the

low temperature half which suggest the possibility of

strong electron retrapping. The evaluation on Ge doped

optical fibres showed a highly favourable TL

characteristics exhibited by CF and FF indicate a great

potential in radiotherapy postal dose audit.

PO-0777 Importance of dosimetry formalism for cells

irradiation on a SARRP and consequences for RBE

M. Dos Santos

1

, V. Paget

2

, M. Ben Kacem

2

, F. Trompier

3

,

M. Benadjaoud

1

, A. François

2

, O. Guipaud

2

, M.