Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  99 / 596 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 99 / 596 Next Page
Page Background

3

Preparation of Inocula and Test Portions

1

2

The

Listeria

cultures used in this evaluation were propagated onto Tryptic Soy Agar with 5%

3

Sheep Blood (SBA) from a Q Laboratories frozen stock culture stored at -70°C. Each organism

4

was incubated for 24 ± 2 hours at 35 ±1°C. Isolated colonies were picked to 10 mL of Brain

5

Heart Infusion (BHI) broth and incubated for 18 ± 0.5 hours at 35 ±1°C. Raw chicken breast

6

fillet was inoculated in bulk using the fresh, broth culture. Prior to inoculation of the deli turkey,

7

the culture suspension was heat stressed at 55 ± 1

o

C in a water bath for 15 ±0.5minutes to obtain

8

a percent injury of 50-80% (as determined by plating onto selective Modified Oxford agar

9

(MOX) and non-selective tryptic soy agar with yeast (TSA/ye). The degree of injury was

10

estimated as:

11

12

where n

select

= number of colonies on selective agar and n

nonselect

= number of colonies on non-

13

selective agar. Appropriate dilutions of each culture were prepared in Butterfield’s Phosphate

14

Diluent (BPD) based on previously established growth curves for both low and high inoculation

15

levels. Bulk portions of each matrix were inoculated with the diluted liquid inoculum and mixed

16

thoroughly to ensure an even distribution of microorganisms. The inoculated raw chicken

17

breastfillet was packaged into separate 30 g test portions in sterile Whirl-Pak

®

bags and shipped

18

to the collaborators. For the analysis of the deli turkey, 25 g of inoculated test product was

19

mixed with 100 g of un-inoculated test product to prepare 125 g test portions which were

20

packaged in sterile Whirl-Pak

®

bags and shipped to collaborators.

21

To determine the level of

Listeria

in the matrices, a 5-tube most probable number (MPN) was

22

conducted by the coordinating laboratory on the day of the initiation of analysis using the

23

USDA/FSIS-MLG 8.09 reference method. For deli turkey, the MPN was determined by

24

analyzing 5 x 250 g test portions,thereference method test portions from the collaborating

25

laboratories and 5 x 65 g test portions. For the raw chicken breast fillet, the MPN of the high and

26

low inoculated levels was determined by analyzing 5 x 50 g test portions, the reference method

27

test portions from the collaborating laboratories and 5 x 10 g test portions. The MPN and 95%

28

confidence intervals were calculated using the LCF MPN Calculator, Version 1.6,

29

( www.lcftld.com/customer/LCFMPNCaclucator.exe )

, provided by AOAC Research Institute

30

(RI) [7].

31

32

Test Portion Distribution

33

34

All samples were labeled with a randomized, blind-coded 3-digit number affixed to the sample

35

container. Test portions were shipped on a Thursday via overnight delivery according to the

36

Category B Dangerous Goods shipment regulations set forth by the International Air

37

Transportations Association(IATA).The two matrices were shipped consecutively, with

38

collaborating laboratories performing analysis on one matrix at a time. Upon receipt, samples

39

were held by the collaborating laboratory at refrigeration temperature (2-8 °C) until the

40

following Monday when analysis was initiatedafter a total equilibration time of 96 hours.All

41

samples were packed with cold packs to target a temperature of < 7°C during shipment.

42

In addition to each of the test portions and a separate APCsample, collaborators received a test

43

portion for each matrix labeled as ‘temperature control’. Participants were instructed to obtain

44

the temperature of this portion upon receipt of the package, document the results on the Sample

45

Receipt Confirmation form provided and fax or email it back to the study director.The shipment

46

and hold timesof the inoculated test material had been verified as a quality control measure prior

47

to study initiation.

48

100 )

1(

x

n

n

nonselect

select

AOAC Research Institute

Expert Review Panel Use Only

OMAMAN-29 A/ Collaboartive Study Manuscript

OMA ERP June 2016

ERP Use Only