Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  93 / 124 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 93 / 124 Next Page
Page Background

South-North Corridor GRIP 2017 |

93

Table 7.5:

Boundary conditions for case study 3a and 3b

Figure 7.11:

Case study 3a flow patterns

Figure 7.12:

Case study 3b flow patterns

ITs

IT

ITe

CH

DEn

FRn

AT

2030 LOW Disruption Norpipe

NO min

ITs

IT

ITe

CH

DEn

FRn

AT

2030 PCI Disruption Norpipe

NO min

7.3.5 CASE STUDY 3A/3B

CASE DESCRIPTION

Year

2030

Climatic conditions

Peak Demand: Northern EU

Supply disruptions

Norwegian flows (Norpipe to DE)

Infrastructure level

a) Low

b) PCI

Supply prices

Norwegian most expensive

A third interesting case assumes the interruption of Norwegian flows towards Ger-

many at the Emden interconnection point, as it is one of the main access points for

this source to Europe. At the same time, the residual flows from Norway are as-

sumed to become relatively more expensive, since the availability of this supply is

becoming more limited.

The outcomes of this configuration differ from the previous ones due to the wide

availability of Russian flows, neither disrupted nor restricted by price constraints. In

this situation, reverse flows are activated only from Italy towards Switzerland and

Germany, while the IP between Italy and Austria is used to convey part of the

Russian resources towards Europe. Again, in the PCI infrastructure level more gas

is made available to the Italian system (Figure 7.12) and indirectly for the overall of

Europe compared to the “Low” infrastructure level situation (Figure 7.11).