88 |
South-North Corridor GRIP 2017
Some recent actual examples which cannot be fully covered neither foreseen due to
the necessary degree of simplification any model requires are:
\\
low LNG deliveries combined with other specific demand drivers, such for
example multiple nuclear outages in France (December 2016) or Northern
Europe
\\
more or less prolonged cold snap, associated with high demand for power
generation (January 2017)
\\
restriction to storage or production capacities at key facilities (Rough in the
United Kingdom, Bergermeer and/or Groningen in the Netherlands during
2016)
Nevertheless, some of these events almost brought “Transitgas [forward] flows close
to zero” (Argus European Gas Report, 7 February 2017) with the price spread
between PSV and Northern EU hubs reverting to a discount from the current usual
premium conditions.
The gas infrastructure managed to support the high energy demand under all the
specific circumstances mentioned above.
In the following sections, the results obtained from the NeMo model are reported
identifying the prevailing flows under the considered cases. Since the specific
figures produced by the model represent one of potentially many solutions, the exact
numbers for flows are not reported. Flow directions and relative magnitudes are
considered as the significant outcomes and represented respectively by arrows and
corresponding thickness.
For Italy, the two nodes ITs and ITe, which represent respectively the total of
capacities available in competition for import flows at southern Italian IPs (flows from
North Africa, Southern Corridor, East Mediterranean, Middle East and possible
future LNG regasification plants) and the total of capacities in competition for export
flows towards Austria and Switzerland, are reported in addition to flows at the Italian
national balancing point (IT) in order to be consistent with the NeMo network
topology.
For all the following flow patterns representations, the darker blue arrows should be
intended as results produced by the NeMo modelling tool taking into account the
same assumption on capacities as in TYNDP 2017. The faded blue arrows refer to
flows originating from simulations taking into account the capacity at Oltingue IP
from Switzerland to France as fully firm. This additional sensitivity analysis, included
in the “cases c and d,” for consistency reasons has been adopted to reflect the
particular nature of the capacity at Oltingue IP from Switzerland (CH) to France
(FRn), currently declared as firm without additional constraints only at the Swiss side
in the direction of CH towards FRn (at the French side its nature is still under
definition).
4)
4) For a complete description of the capacities along the South-North Corridor and their use in the ENTSOG NeMo tool,
please refer to the previous
Chapter 6,in particular to the section
“6.5 South-North Corridor Capacities: An Overall Picture”.