101 / 122
Southern Corridor GRIP 2017–2026 |
101
20–40%
<20%
<40%
10–30%
>20%
0–50GWh/d
0–80% of capacity
50–250GWh/d
250–600GWh/d
600–1100GWh/d
>1100GWh/d
<30%
80–99% of capacity
99–100% of capacity
20–40%
<20%
<40%
10–30%
>20%
0–50GWh/d
0–80% of capacity
50–250GWh/d
250–600GWh/d
600–1100GWh/d
>1100GWh/d
<30%
80–99% of capacity
99–100% of capacity
20–40%
<20%
<40%
10–30%
>20%
0–50GWh/d
0–80% of cap
50–250GWh/d
250–600GWh/d
600–1100GWh/d
>1100GWh/d
<30%
80–99% of ca
99–100% of c
20–40%
<20%
<40%
10–30%
>20%
0–50GWh/d
0–80% of cap
50–250GWh/d
250–600GWh/d
600–1100GWh/d
>1100GWh/d
<30%
80–99% of ca
99–100% of c
Figure 7.3.1:
2020 Low No disruption
Figure 7.3.3:
2020 PCI No disruption
Figure 7.3.2:
2030 Low No disruption
Figure 7.3.4:
2030 PCI No disruption
7.3.1 NON – DISRUPTION CASE
7.3.1.1 Remaining Flexibility and Flows in Non-disruption case
As shown in the following Figures 7.3.1 to 7.3.4, all countries, with the exception of
Croatia in the 2030 low infrastructure scenario, have positive Remaining Flexibility
in non-disruption cases. Austria, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Bosnia & Herzegovina and
Serbia mark the higher values at or near 100% while Croatia has the lower, at the
Low infrastructure level case.