Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  48 / 136 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 48 / 136 Next Page
Page Background

4. Does the method, as

written, contain all

appropriate precautions

and warnings related to

the method's reagents,

components,

instrumentation, or

method steps that may be

hazardous? If no, please

suggest wording or

option(s).

Yes, although more detail may be beneficial. The

method instructs users to refer to safety data

sheets and local rules for health and environmental

safety. Even though the potential hazards

associated with this method are similar to other

general laboratory procedures, it may be beneficial

for an end user to have the hazards identified more

specifically (e.g. hazards associated with handling

formic acid or hexane and appropriate precautions).

1. Are the definitions

specified in the SMPR

used and applied

appropriately in the

supporting documentation

(manuscripts, method

studies, etc...)? If not,

please explain the

differences and if the

method is impacted by the

difference.

No. As stated in previous answer, the use of dried

versions of whole milk and whole egg instead of the

liquid versions, as defined in the SMPR, cause issues

with the subsequent results and measurement

units. While the dried versions of the allergenic

foods are indeed more suitable to work with (and

more relevant to the food industry), they are not

what is defined in the SMPR. The authors would at

least need to very specifically define any theoretical

or empirical conversions between the materials,

which they do not appear to have done given the

information in the submission.

2. Is there information

demonstrating that the

method meets the SMPR

Method Performance

Requirements using the

Reference Materials

stated in the SMPR? If not,

then specify what is

missing and how this

impacts demonstration of

performance of the

method.

Yes- for the materials used as calibrants for the

method. The authors did not, however, analyze any

external incurred reference materials, only those

prepared in house. Whether or not the reference

materials indicated in the SMPR are relevant for

demonstrating performance is somewhat

debatable, but as mentioned elsewhere, the

authors should demonstrate method performance

on samples other than those used to create the

calibration curve.

3. Is there information

demonstrating that the

method performs within

No. The authors should give the actual values for

performance requirements such as MDL, MQL, and

RSDr, instead of just less than values. It is also