Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  270 / 561 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 270 / 561 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Nashville – 2016

270

TB18

106A-MCC

Finance, Portfolio II

Contributed Session

Chair: Jonathan Liu, Stony Brook University, 61-40 163rd Street,

Flushing, NY, 11365, United States,

Jonathan.m.liu@stonybrook.edu

1 - Portfolio Selection With The Probabilistic Ordered

Weighted Average

Jose M. Merigo, Full Professor, University of Chile, Av. Diagonal

Paraguay 257, Santiago, 8330015, Chile,

jmerigo@fen.uchile.cl,

Sigifredo Laengle, Gino Loyola

This article presents a generalization of Markowitz’s mean-variance portfolio

selection approach by using the probabilistic ordered weighted average. The main

advantage is that it can under or overestimate the information provided in the

classical portfolio approach according to the attitudinal character of the decision

maker. Moreover, it includes the classical Markowitz model as a particular case

when the attitudinal character is not needed, by using only the expected value

which is a particular case of the probabilistic ordered weighted average. The work

considers a wide range of scenarios in financial decision making problems.

2 - Structural Approach To Portfolio Analysis With

Diversification Constraints

Kyungchan Park, PhD Candidate, Yonsei University, Seodaemun-

gu Yonsei-ro 50, School of Business (Bld.#212) Rm.#411, Seoul,

03722, Korea, Republic of,

hippogras@gmail.com,

Hongseon Kim,

Seongmoon Kim

The maximum weight of single stock in mutual fund is limited by regulations to

enforce diversification. Under incomplete information with added constraints on

portfolio weights, enhanced performance had been reported in previous

researches. We use a structural approach to analyze the effects of additional

constraints on the portfolio’s performance by computing the Euclidean distance

from the tangency portfolio, as opposed to analyzing ex-post return only. We find

that the diversification-constrained portfolios generally have a smaller distance

than the unconstrained portfolios.

3 - Monetary Policy And Real Estate Price Fluctuation:

An Analysis On Regional Heterogeneity From China

Charl Chan, Tongji University, Siping Road 1500, Room 1211,

Shanghai, 200092, China,

charlc@yeah.net,

Jiangang Shi

This paper analyzes empirically the relationship among monetary policy, real

estate price and policy aims using PVAR model. The results show that not all areas

of real estate market as a carrier can play a normal function in the process of

transmission from the policy tools to the ultimate goal. Extended McCallum rule

executed against the regional real estate price bubble will affect the normal

supply of the basic currency to other area. And Extended Taylor rule executed

will exacerbate deflation in the areas which real estate market is ineffective as a

carrier, while it can bring negative effects to other area economic fundamentals.

4 - Efficient Allocation Of Tarp Funds To U.s. Banks

Jonathan Liu, Stony Brook University, 61-40 163rd Street,

Flushing, NY, 11365, United States,

Jonathan.m.liu@stonybrook.edu,

Herbert F Lewis, Dmytro Holod

In 2008 the government allocated hundreds of billions of dollars to banks all

across the United States under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). The

main purpose of TARP was to encourage bank lending during the financial crisis.

In this paper, we apply data envelopment analysis (DEA) as part of a two-step

process to measure the efficiency of the distribution of funds. DEA is a linear

programming-based methodology for measuring relative efficiency of decision

making units (DMU). A reallocation model is used to show how funds could have

been assigned in a more efficient manner and how additional lending could have

been achieved. Finally, we find common characteristics among the inefficient

banks.

TB19

106B-MCC

Computational Methods for Healthcare Applications

Sponsored: Computing

Sponsored Session

Chair: Burak Eksioglu, Clemson University, Clemson University,

Clemson, SC, 29634, United States,

burak@clemson.edu

1 - Optimal Compromises Between Efficiency And Practicality

Andrew C Trapp, Worcester Polytechnic Institute,

atrapp@wpi.edu

In many real-world contexts, the output of an optimization model may be

impractical to implement directly due to a variety of factors. For example, an

optimized medical personnel schedule may specify such a large deviation from

the (non-optimized) status quo, that it might only be possible to roll out over

time. We discuss our methodology, TOpS (Transition toward the Optimal

Solution), that creates optimal deployment plans for binary integer programs.

TOpS illuminates the most improving steps within a specified deviation from the

status quo. We implement TOpS in two popular modeling environments, and

demonstrate how it can find the best improving steps while managing change

from present conditions.

2 - Two-stage Stochastic Programming For Vaccine

Vial Replenishment

Zahra Azadi, Clemson University,

zazadi@clemson.edu

,

Harsha Gangammnavar, Sandra D Eksioglu

Multi-dose vaccine vials must be utilized within a short time if not protected in

appropriate temperature. The remaining doses are discarded. Single-dose vials do

not contribute to Open Vial Wastage (OVW), but have higher purchase and

inventory holding costs per dose than multi-dose vaccine vials. This study

presents a two-stage stochastic programming model that aids health care

practitioners identify inventory replenishment and vial opening policies which

minimize costs and OVW. We compare the performance of optimal with myopic

policies in the presence of random demand.

3 - Optimal Quarantining Policy For Ebola Epidemic

Ceyda Yaba, Clemson University,

cyaba@clemson.edu,

Burak Eksioglu, Amin Khademi

The actions taken during a deadly epidemic can be crucial in order to eradicate

the disease. We model a Markov decision model for an Ebola epidemic in two

districts with the objective of minimizing incidence while quarantining infectious

people. However, as the capacities of the quarantine facilities are limited, we need

to find a decision rule for quarantining infectious population so that the incidence

is minimized in both of the districts.

TB20

106C-MCC

Robust Multiobjective Optimization for Decision

Making under Uncertainty and Conflict

Tutorial Session

Chair: Margaret M Wiecek, Clemson University, Mathematical Sciences

Dept, Clemson, SC, 29634-1907, United States,

wmalgor@clemson.edu

1 - Robust Multiobjective Optimization For Decision Making Under

Uncertainty And Conflict

Margaret M Wiecek, Clemson University, Mathematical Sciences

Dept, Clemson, SC, 29634-1907, United States,

wmalgor@clemson.edu

, Garrett M Dranichak

Many real-life problems in engineering, business, and management are

characterized by multiple, conflicting objectives, as well as the presence of

uncertainty. The conflicting criteria originate from various ways to assess system

performance and the multiplicity of decision makers, while uncertainty results

from inaccurate or unknown data due to imperfect models and measurements,

lack of knowledge, and volatility of the global environment. In this tutorial, the

deterministic approaches to uncertainty that are integrated with multiobjective

optimization to address decision making under uncertainty and conflict are

discussed. The approaches are based on robust optimization and parametric

optimization, both developed for single-objective settings. Six sources of

uncertainty are presented, and each type of uncertainty is placed in the

multiobjective optimization problem (MOP), yielding several types of uncertain

MOPs (UMOPs). Some of the sources are adopted from earlier studies in (single-

objective) engineering optimization, while the others result from the

multiobjective optimization modus operandi. The UMOP models are classified first

according to the location of the uncertainty in their formulation, second with

respect to the undertaken optimization approach, and third on the basis of the

proposed definition of robust efficient solutions. The models are presented along

with the accompanying results on solution concepts, properties, methods, and

applications that are specific to each case. It is expected that the topics selected in

this tutorial and their organization may help beginners to become familiar with

the area of robust multiobjective optimization while serving as a reference to

researchers.

TB18