Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  32 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

32

potential of hydropower (MoENRP 2015). The flow

of three trans-boundary river basins also used for

hydropower – Alazani (Gamik), Khrami-Debed and

Aghstev basins – is likely to decline due to declining

precipitation and increased temperatures by the

end of the century (UNDP 2011). Reduced water

availability and increasing temperatures may also

have adverse effects on thermal and nuclear power

that need water for cooling (WB 2009).

Additional stress factors in the energy sector are

the expected increase in frequency and severity of

Energy

Primary energy supplies in the three countries vary

according to their access to fossil fuels and water

resources.

16

Georgia relies on imported gas and oil, but

also have renewable energy such as hydropower for

electricity and heating, whileAzerbaijan

17

reliesmainly

on its gas and oil resources. Armenia

18

uses a mix of

imported gas resources, nuclear energy and national

water resources (IEA 2013). As such, the vulnerability

of the energy sector to climate change varies depends

on the main energy source in each country.

Hydropower is by far the most vulnerable energy

source due to its dependency on stable water

supplies that are likely to be affected by changes in

precipitation patterns, reduced glacial water, and

higher evaporation due to warmer temperatures.

Water resources are predicted to decline across the

region. Hydropower in Georgia is, for example,

centred on glacier-fed rivers originating in the

Greater Caucasus Mountains, such as the Inguri

and Rioni River. Glacial runoff of these rivers

is likely to be reduced by 13 per cent by 2100 due

to increased melting consequently reducing the

Inguri Dam, Georgia