Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  34 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

34

250 industrial plants have been subject to flooding

since 1978. If these events increase in the future as

a result of climate change, it becomes even more

important to increase the resilience of industrial

structures (MoENR 2010). It is currently unknown

whether the planning of new industrial construction

takes the impacts of climate change into consideration

(UNECE 2010).

An example of the consequences of poorly

managed toxic waste comes from the Tsana arsenic

mining sites in Georgia. When the three mining

sites were abandoned in 1992, approximately

50,000 tons of arsenic ore were left in surface and

some amount of highly toxic materials were in

unprotected containers. The three sites are close to

the Tskhenistkali River, a tributary to Rioni River,

and so the leaking arsenic waste posed a threat

to both nearby villages and the whole of Western

Georgia. There was a high risk that the waste

would be released into the environment when the

Tskhenistkali River flooded in 2013. Fortunately,

no further contamination due to the flooding has

been observed thus far. Due to a growing concern

regarding the contamination threat from the three

sites, a joint project of OSCE, UNEP/OCHA and

UNDP Georgia in cooperation with the Ministry

of Environment and Natural Resources Protection

was initiated in 2013 partly with the goal of

containing the waste more securely on-site (UNEP/

ENVSEC 2014).

In spite of the increasing need to consider climate

change when planning industrial activities, little

research has been done on how industrial structures

will respond to, or interact with, climate change. An

overview of the current risk zones of, for example,

old and unstable industrial sites, is lacking but clearly

necessary if catastrophic consequences are to be

avoided in the future (UNECE 2010).

Oil derricks on the shore near Baku, Azerbaijan