Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  27 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

23

National Standards of Practice for Case Management

SATISFACTORY

BELOW SATISFACTORY

CM can show compliance with the CMSA National Code of

Ethics and/or their professional discipline’s code of ethics (as

applicable).

CM does not comply with the CMSA National Code of Ethics

and/or their professional discipline’s code of ethics (as

applicable).

2G

Reflect and operate in an ethical manner in accordance with the CMSA National Code of Ethics for Case

Management (i.e. Values, Principles, Ethical Practice and Professional Conduct).

GOOD ACHIEVEMENT

SATISFACTORY

BELOW SATISFACTORY

CM implements agency participation of

pilot programs.

CM can demonstrate innovative

responses utilising resources outside

of the mainstream service system.

CM shows no initiative in development

or implementation of resources

outside of mainstream service

system.

CM assists a group of Clients with the

same service issue to share ideas for

possible solutions.

CM documents Client involvement

and ideas to provide solutions.

CM documentation does not identify/

support Client consultation.

CM takes a lead role in collaborative

actions to address service gaps.

CM can demonstrate use of peer

support, case conferences and

networking to generate ideas for

solutions.

CM cannot provide examples of

seeking input from peers, etc.

2F

Use collaboration to generate innovative responses to meet Client needs where immediate solutions are not

available.

STANDARD 2 – PLANNING

Self Assessment

Satisfactory

Below satisfactory

Verified Assessment

Satisfactory

Below satisfactory

Self Assessment

Good achievement

Satisfactory

Below satisfactory

Verified Assessment

Good achievement

Satisfactory

Below satisfactory