Background Image
Previous Page  23 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

March 2015

AFRICAN FUSION

No Orient Flaw Type

Flaw Size(inch)

Length Depth % Depth

1

Circ.

Crack

0.30

0.085

55

2

Circ.

VLOF

0.40

0.085

55

3

Circ.

Crack

0.42

0.035

22

4

Circ.

HLOF

0.36

0.102

66

5

Circ.

Crack

0.71

0.050

32

6

Circ.

Crack

0.48

0.032

20

Parameter

Setting

Gain

37 dB

Digitising frequency

50 MHz

Inspection mode

Pulse-echo

Steering angle

35°to 80°

Angle resolution

1.0°

Voltage

80 V

mens and six flaws in total were inserted into the specimens.

Types of inserted flaws include a fatigue crack developed

from the triple point, horizontal lack of fusion (HLOF), which

occurs at the boundary of the piping and the weld metal, and

vertical lack of fusion (VLOF), which occurs at the boundary

of the coupling and the weld metal. Detailed specifications of

the flaws inserted are provided in Table 2.

Experiment apparatus

The ultrasonic probe was manufactured based on design

parameters verified through the modelling. Figure 5 displays

the shear wave phased array ultrasonic probe manufactured

in this study.

For the phase array ultrasonic instrument, ZETEC’s Omnis-

can, which has 16 channel operation capability and is portable

for site inspection, was used. The signal obtained from the

Omniscanwas connected via TCP/IP communication protocol

for storage on a laptop computer, andUltravison version 1.1Q6

was usedas the signal evaluation software. For the experiment,

the apparatus was set up as shown in Figure 6.

For the experiment, a scanner was clamped to the flawed

specimens and then a base point was determined. Subse-

quently, the scanner revolved 360

°

in the circumferential

direction around the specimens and captured the signal. The

setting values of the phased array ultrasonic test instrument

used for the experiment are seen in Table 3. After entering the

setting values for operation of the probe, the ultrasonic beam

was generated at angles ranging from 35

°

to 80

°

.

Results and review

The experiment was carried out using the flawed socket weld

specimens with a fatigue crack and lack of fusion (LOF) flaws.

Based on the results, the signal was evaluated. For the fatigue

crack specimen, as the coupler welded onto the piping was

elbow-shaped and manufactured from a casting, inspection

of the coupler was not possible. The scanner was therefore

clamped to part of the piping before obtaining the signal.

Figure 7 illustrates the results of the inspection using a

flawed specimen with a nominal diameter of 1.0″ and a leg

length of 1:1. As seen in the figure, three flaws including the

LOF and a fatigue crack were detected at the front and a rear

angle of 46.5

°

– within the range of refraction angles from

35

°

to 80

°

– and the length of the flaws was measured at the

signal of the B-scan. As a result of measuring the length of the

specimen with a leg length of 1:1, the length of the fatigue

crack and LOF flaws were measured to be slightly longer than

the actual length. As the crack tip signal was not confirmed at

the obtained signal, it was not possible tomeasure the depth.

TheNo. 3 crack flawapplied to the specimenswas a fatigue

crackoriginatingfromthetriplepointandevolvedintotheinter-

nal diameter of the piping. As the crack grew in the same direc-

tionas theultrasonicwaveheaded toward it and tiltedat a large

angle, a relatively small amplitude was identified for the flaw.

Figure 8 shows the results of an experiment for a flawed speci-

men with a leg length of 1:2 . As seen in the figure, one LOF

flaw and two fatigue cracks were detected and the length of

the flaws was measured from the B-scan signal.

In the case of a flawed specimenwitha leg lengthof 1:2, the

No. 5 crack and No. 4 HLOF flaw were found to have a higher

level of amplitudewhile aNo. 6 crack flawwith 20%depthwas

found to have a low level of amplitude. A size evaluation of the

six flaws included in the flawspecimens is presented inTable 4.

Table 2: Detailed information of the flaws contained in flawed specimens.

Figure 5: The shear wave phased array ultrasonic probe for small

bore piping socket weld.

Table 3: Experimental parameters.

Figure 6: Experimental setup of phased array ultrasonic system.

21