Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  82 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 82 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

Technical article

May 2015

80

www.read-eurowire.com

Temperature rise due to the Joule heating

effect is known to be proportional to I

2

R

losses

[8]

so, as current is fixed for each

measurement point, the resistance of

the cable pair under investigation will

differentiate temperature rise from one

cable to another.

Therefore, as expected, the cable with

highest DC resistance will have the most

temperature rise, and vice versa.

Discussion

Heating cables is known to increase

attenuation

[9]

which has a limiting effect

on cable reach. In relation to PoE, the

maximum temperature is likely to be in

the proximity of the energised conductors

which may be used for data transmission.

Therefore, the consequences of DC

powering on attenuation of the same pair

should be taken into consideration.

The results presented in this paper show

the temperature rise of one pair energised

with DC power using a cable located in a

controlled 20°C environment. Realistically,

the ambient temperature will vary from

site-to-site,

and

therefore,

caution

should be taken when installing PoE

systems into uncontrolled and/or warmer

environments.

Further consideration should be given to

the correlation of simulated data and that

of the installation environment. On one

hand, the simulation may be based on a

worst case scenario. However, in reality,

the duty cycle may dictate that the power

is only supplied for a fraction of the time.

Good installation practices should be

implemented wherever possible, such

as minimising bundle sizes, accounting

for temperature rise for maximum cable

lengths, and keeping pathways and spaces

free of thermally insulating materials.

It is important to note that, while excellent

correlation was seen between simulated

and measured results for a single cable

setup, this work was not intended to

replicate the behaviour of cables in

bundles.

However, it is anticipated that good

correlation between theory and practice

will also apply to bundled configurations

in free air and in a variety of cable

containment systems, ie tray, trunking,

conduit, etc.

A comparison between the CCA 24 AWG

UTP and Cat6A 26 AWG U/FTP samples

show that it is possible for cables with

smaller conductors to radiate less heat

than those of larger conductors when

supplied with identical DC current values.

It is also known that the conductive foil

in screened cables act as a heat sink

which helps to reduce the amount of heat

radiated from the cable

[10]

.

Therefore, it is important to take into

account the construction of cable, and

not only the conductor diameter for PoE

system deployment.

Individual Value Plot of Differences (with Ho and 95% t-confidence for the mean)

Differences

Δ Conductor temperature (ºC)

Current (A)

Cat6A-26AWG

CCA-24AWG

Cat5e-24AWG

Current (A)

Δ Conductor temperature (ºC)

Measurement

Simulation

Approximation

Figure 4

:

Simulated, measured and approximated change in conductor temperature

Figure 5

:

Individual value plot of temperature differences

Figure 6

:

Measured change in conductor temperature