Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  136 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 136 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

CAPGEMINI: PEOPLE, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND BUSINESS ETHICS

3.3 Managing our environmental impact

3

136

Registration Document 2016 — Capgemini

Managing climate risk

3.3.3

Group for the first time, to complement those already in place in

remain focused on reducing our greenhouse gas emissions and in

2016 we set environmental targets for the whole Capgemini

Capgemini recognizes the importance of climate change and our

responsibility as a business to mitigate our own impacts. We

our larger entities.

only a future inevitability but are already being experienced. As

well as minimizing our own contribution to climate change and

Climate change impacts and global temperature increases are not

We have a number of mechanisms in place to identify, control and

manage climate-related risks, including:

means, for example, ensuring business continuity and supporting

the wellbeing of our people in the face of extreme weather events.

working with clients to enable carbon reductions, we need to

ensure we have the capability to adapt to climate change. This

what “impacts” these have (or could have) legally and

commercially for Capgemini, the risks associated with each

Register”, which is reviewed annually. This identifies key

environmental “aspects” (such as energy use or flooding),

all ISO 14001 certified entities have an “Aspects and Impacts

1.

and key mitigation steps taken;

India, with a focus on key assets and operations, supply chain

complete a Climate Change Risk Assessment. This looked at

the key risks and opportunities for Capgemini in the UK and

in 2014, we commissioned

NGO Forum for the Future

to

2.

risk and on the impacts within key sectors (such as retail and

the public sector) which Capgemini serves;

change mitigation, energy security and the continued need for

Capgemini to reduce its GHG emissions to our stakeholders.

the completion of a materiality assessment (refer to

3.

section 3.1.3) also highlighted the importance of climate

climate change risk into our corporate risk management. The

focus will be on evaluating climate change hazards (such as

To build further on this, we are currently in the early stages of

developing a Group-wide approach which will further integrate

clients and our industry and considering how our services can

support these.

assets, client workplace locations, suppliers and clients. We will

also be identifying new climate-related opportunities from our

shortages) and assessing our capacity to adapt to these. The

evaluation will assess the vulnerability to climate change of our

extreme weather events, changing weather patterns and water

in the

CDP Climate Change disclosure

, placing us in the top 23%

Our commitment to managing our climate risk effectively

continues to be recognized externally, this year with a score of A-

of companies in our sector.

Our environmental performance

3.3.4

Overall emissions

In 2015, Capgemini’s total GHG emissions for the entire Group

were 527,529 tCO

2

e. Comparison with the 2015 restated data

shows that total emissions have decreased very slightly by 0.5%,

in spite of a significant 4.4% increase in average headcount during

energy-related emissions per head of 6.6% and a reduction of our

travel emissions per head of 3.2%.

head in 2016 (from 2.98 tons CO

2

e per head to 2.84 tons of CO

2

e

per head

(1)

. Primarily this has been driven by a reduction in our

2016. As a result we have already made progress against our

headline Group target, with a 4.7% reduction in emissions per

Emissions per head by region

-4%

-11%

+8%

-2%

-6%

-4%

-8%

+9%

-6%

-5%

2015

2016

0

1

2

3

5

4

6

North

America

United Kingdom

& Ireland

Nordic

countries

Benelux

Germany &

Central Europe

France

Southern

Europe

Asia-Pacific

& Latin America

India

Total

sections of this report.

using the December 2015 head count as compared to the December 2016 headcount. As a consequence, the headcount stats here may vary slightly from the absolute figures quoted in other

For the purposes of measuring GHG emissions per head, an average headcount over the year has been calculated for both 2015 and 2016, which represents a more accurate calculation than

(1)