BEMIP Gas Regional Investment Plan 2017 |
3
5
MODELLING RESULTS 94 5.1 ENTSOG TYNDP Modelling Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 5.2 BEMIP GRIP Additional Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 5.3 Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 5.4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1006
ANALYSIS OF MODELLING RESULTS
BY COUNTRY 104 6.1 Denmark and Sweden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.2 Estonia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.3 Finland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 6.4 Latvia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.5 Lithuania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.6 Poland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1097
CONCLUSIONS 110 ABBREVIATIONS 113 COUNTRY CODES (ISO) 114 ASSUMPTIONS 114 LIST OF TABLES 115 LIST OF FIGURES 116 LEGAL DISCLAIMER 119