Page 40 - 2013 Hospitals/Systems Digest US.NMH.13.02.007
Basic HTML Version
40
HOSPI TALS IN INTEGRATED SYSTEMS
HOSPITALS/SYSTEMS DIGEST 2013
SANOFI / MANAGED CARE DIGEST SERIES
®
/ WHERE INFORMATION BECOMES INTELLIGENCE.
™
Majority of Hospitals Are Affiliated With Systems in 15 of 20 MSAs
• More than half of hospitals in 15 out of the
20 selected metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs)
were affiliated with integrated systems
in 2012; this share in Cleveland approached 97%
• Although the shares of hospitals in San Diego
(65.2%) and San Francisco (81.8%) that were tied
to systems were well above half, just 34.4% of
facilities in Los Angeles were in systems in 2012.
Data source: IMS Health © 2013
Atlanta Hospital Share Tied to Integrated Systems Continues Steady Growth
• The number and share of Atlanta hospitals
affiliated with integrated systems rose annually
from 2007 to 2012. The number of system-tied
hospitals climbed by two-thirds over this time.
• By 2012, nearly three out of every five Atlanta
hospitals were affiliated with integrated
systems, with much of this growth coming
from the addition of another system in 2010.
DEMOGRAPHICS
facilities within integrated health systems in selected msas, 2012
1
MSA
# of
Systems Hospitals
2
Medical
Groups
3
HMOs/
PPOs
4
Nursing
Homes
Home
Health
Agencies
FOSCs
5
DICs
6
Atlanta, GA
6
59.5% 24.3% 0.0% 7.1% 2.1% 7.9% 32.8%
Baltimore, MD
7
87.0
15.7
0.0
3.8
10.3
4.1
15.7
Boston, MA–NH
4
54.3
19.8
5.6
16.5
4.5
7.7
15.9
Chicago, IL
12
51.2
30.5
0.0
4.4
3.7
14.8
18.0
Cleveland–
Lorain–Elyria, OH
5
96.6
31.6
0.0
21.9
5.9
24.5
64.9
Dallas, TX
4
50.8
27.9
3.3
3.1
0.2
15.9
18.8
Detroit, MI
4
56.4
37.3
12.5
5.4
2.1
15.5
36.2
Houston, TX
3
35.9
14.0
14.3
0.9
1.0
17.4
15.3
Kansas City, MO–KS
2
31.4
32.1
0.0
1.7
4.8
12.3
7.1
Los Angeles–
Long Beach, CA
4
34.4
25.6
6.3
1.9
1.8
1.2
7.7
Miami, FL
2
52.0
6.3
14.3
4.0
0.5
10.8
11.4
Minneapolis–
Saint Paul, MN–WI
4
63.6
34.1
18.2
7.3
3.2
9.3
17.8
New York, NY
12
63.9
17.0
26.3
8.1
2.8
1.4
5.0
Philadelphia, PA–NJ
8
53.0
22.9
7.7
4.3
5.6
11.2
21.5
Phoenix–Mesa, AZ
2
35.7
14.2
12.5
3.6
1.0
11.4
27.3
Pittsburgh, PA
4
66.7
41.5
14.3
6.1
3.5
14.3
27.7
San Diego, CA
4
65.2
36.8
50.0
4.5
11.4
7.8
40.7
San Francisco, CA
2
81.8
32.3
0.0
22.9
17.1
7.3
19.2
St. Louis, MO–IL
4
48.6
16.8
0.0
3.8
5.2
9.1
14.8
Washington, DC–
MD–VA–WV
5
53.8
2.2
0.0
10.4
10.6
7.1
8.6
1
Systems included in this table were headquartered in the MSAs listed.
2
Hospital data are based on all short-term, acute-care, nonfederal hospitals.
3
IMS Health defines medical group practices as those with five or more FTE physicians whose primary business is seeing regularly scheduled patients
for nonsurgical services other than imaging. Physicians must have a share in the practice and offer outpatient care, and the practice must be
physically separate from a hospital. Anesthesiology and pathology groups are excluded.
4
HMO/PPO data are based on headquarters’ locations, not service areas.
5
Freestanding outpatient surgery center
6
Diagnostic imaging center
LOCAL SPOTLIGHT
NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF HOSPITALS IN SYSTEMS, ATLANTA, 2006–2012
41.7%
36%
43%
50%
57%
64%
Percentage of Hospitals
in Systems
12
16
20
24
28
Number of Hospitals
in Systems
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
15
15
18
19
22
24
25
39.5%
46.2%
47.5%
55.0%
58.5%
59.5%
Number of Hospitals
Percentage of Hospitals
