ENTSOG TYNDP 2015

Background Image

Previous Page

Next Page

Page Background

Ten Year Network Development Plan 2015 |

219

List of Tables

2 INFRASTRUCTURE

2.1 Breakdown of projects in TYNDP 2015 by FID status and PCI status . . . 24

3 BARRIERS TO INVESTMENT

3.1 Categories of barriers to investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

4 DEMAND

4.1 Breakdown of the year to year gas consumption evolution . . . . . . . 37 4.2 High daily and highest 14-day gas consumption . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4.3 2009 – 2014 peak gas consumptions and their simultaneity . . . . . . . 44 4.4 Combination of scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.5 GHG reductions according to 2050 EU Roadmap . . . . . . . . . . 64 4.6 Maximum and minimum winter daily load-factors for the variable sources . 67 4.7 Considered emission factors for the different fuels for power generation for the variable sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

5 SUPPLY

5.1 Existing import routes of gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 5.2 Potential scenarios for shale gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.3 Potential scenarios for biomethane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 5.4 Potential pipeline gas scenarios from Russia . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 5.5 Export capacity of the Gassco offshore system . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 5.6 Potential pipeline gas scenarios from Norway . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 5.7 Algeria’s upcoming natural gas projects (Source EIA 2013, country report Algeria) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 5.8 Potential pipeline gas scenarios from Algeria . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 5.9 Libya pipeline gas potential scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 5.10 Potential pipeline gas scenarios from Azerbaijan . . . . . . . . . . 106 5.11 Current pipeline infrastructure of Turkmenistan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 5.12 Potential pipeline gas scenarios from Turkmenistan . . . . . . . . . 109 5.13 Evolution of the LNG exports per area 2014 – 2035 . . . . . . . . . 125 5.14 Split of the LNG exports destination by area . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 5.15 Split of the maximum supply scenario per producing area . . . . . . . 126 5.16 Potential minimum LNG scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 5.17 Potential LNG scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127